From: Gao Xiang <gaoxian...@huawei.com>
As Christoph said, "This looks like a really obsfucated
way to write:
return datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION ||
datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY; "
Although I had my own consideration, it's the right way for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20190829095954.gb20...@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxian...@huawei.com>
---
fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
index 59dcc2e8cb02..87d7ae82339a 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
+++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
@@ -62,9 +62,8 @@ enum {
static inline bool erofs_inode_is_data_compressed(unsigned int datamode)
{
- if (datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION)
- return true;
- return datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY;
+ return datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION ||
+ datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY;
}
/* bit definitions of inode i_advise */
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
