On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 12:16:53PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 12:59:29PM +0530, Amrita Patole wrote:
> > From: Amrita Patole <amritapat...@gmail.com>
> > 
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_mpi.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_mpi.c 
> > b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_mpi.c
> > index 9e422bbbb6ab..f63db2c79fac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_mpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_mpi.c
> > @@ -136,7 +136,8 @@ static int ql_get_mb_sts(struct ql_adapter *qdev, 
> > struct mbox_params *mbcp)
> >                 ql_read_mpi_reg(qdev, qdev->mailbox_out + i,
> >                                  &mbcp->mbox_out[i]);
> >             if (status) {
> > -                   netif_err(qdev, drv, qdev->ndev, "Failed mailbox 
> > read.\n");
> > +                   netif_err(qdev, drv, qdev->ndev,
> > +                                  "Failed mailbox read. \n");


                        netif_err(qdev, drv, qdev->ndev,
                                  "Failed mailbox read. \n");
                                  "Failed mailbox read. \n");


I'm pretty sure this will introduce a couplee new checkpatch warnings...
It should be indented:
[tab][tab][tab][tab][space][space]"Failed mailbox read.\n");

No space after the period, please.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to