Hi Jonathan,
On Sat, 2020-02-01 at 17:08 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 16:20:49 +0200
> Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardel...@analog.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Nuno Sá <nuno...@analog.com>
> >
> > All the ADIS devices perform, at the beginning, a self test to make
> > sure
> > the device is in a sane state. Furthermore, some drivers also do a
> > call
> > to `adis_reset()` before the test which is also a good practice.
> > This
> > patch unifies all those operation so that, there's no need for code
> > duplication. Furthermore, the rst pin is also checked to make sure
> > the
> > device is not in HW reset. On top of this, some drivers also read
> > the
> > device product id and compare it with the device being probed to
> > make
> > sure the correct device is being handled. This can also be passed
> > to the
> > library by introducing a variable holding the PROD_ID register of
> > the
> > device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno...@analog.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardel...@analog.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/imu/Kconfig | 1 +
> > drivers/iio/imu/adis.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > ------
> > include/linux/iio/imu/adis.h | 15 ++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/imu/Kconfig
> > index 60bb1029e759..63036cf473c7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/Kconfig
> > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ endmenu
> >
> > config IIO_ADIS_LIB
> > tristate
> > + depends on GPIOLIB
> > help
> > A set of IO helper functions for the Analog Devices ADIS*
> > device family.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/adis.c b/drivers/iio/imu/adis.c
> > index d02b1911b0f2..1eca5271380e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/adis.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/adis.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > */
> >
> > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > #include <linux/mutex.h>
> > #include <linux/device.h>
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > @@ -365,36 +366,64 @@ static int adis_self_test(struct adis *adis)
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > - * adis_inital_startup() - Performs device self-test
> > + * __adis_initial_startup() - Device initial setup
> > * @adis: The adis device
> > *
> > + * This functions makes sure the device is not in reset, via rst
> > pin.
> > + * Furthermore it performs a SW reset (only in the case we are not
> > coming from
> > + * reset already) and a self test. It also compares the product id
> > with the
> > + * device id if the prod_id_reg variable is set.
> > + *
> > * Returns 0 if the device is operational, a negative error code
> > otherwise.
> > *
> > * This function should be called early on in the device
> > initialization sequence
> > * to ensure that the device is in a sane and known state and that
> > it is usable.
> > */
> > -int adis_initial_startup(struct adis *adis)
> > +int __adis_initial_startup(struct adis *adis)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > -
> > - mutex_lock(&adis->state_lock);
> > + struct gpio_desc *gpio;
> > + const struct adis_timeout *timeouts = adis->data->timeouts;
> > + const char *iio_name = spi_get_device_id(adis->spi)->name;
> > + u16 prod_id, dev_id;
> > +
> > + /* check if the device has rst pin low */
> > + gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&adis->spi->dev, "reset",
> > GPIOD_ASIS);
> > + if (IS_ERR(gpio)) {
> > + return PTR_ERR(gpio);
>
> Given you are returning here, no need for else to follow
>
> if (gpio...
>
Definitely...
> > + } else if (gpio && gpiod_get_value_cansleep(gpio)) {
> > + /* bring device out of reset */
> > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpio, 0);
>
> Hmm. So is a software reset the best option if we have a hardware
> reset
> line but it's not currently in the reset mode?
>
Hmm, that's a fair question. Now that I think about it, if we do have a
gpio we should just assume it's in reset and call
`gpiod_set_value_cansleep`. So, I guess we could just ditch the
`gpiod_get_value_cansleep(gpio)` part.
> > + msleep(timeouts->reset_ms);
> > + } else {
> > + ret = __adis_reset(adis);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> >
> > ret = adis_self_test(adis);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - dev_err(&adis->spi->dev, "Self-test failed, trying
> > reset.\n");
> > - __adis_reset(adis);
> > - ret = adis_self_test(adis);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - dev_err(&adis->spi->dev, "Second self-test
> > failed, giving up.\n");
> > - goto out_unlock;
> > - }
> > - }
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> >
> > -out_unlock:
> > - mutex_unlock(&adis->state_lock);
> > - return ret;
> > + if (!adis->data->prod_id_reg)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + ret = adis_read_reg_16(adis, adis->data->prod_id_reg,
> > &prod_id);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = sscanf(iio_name, "adis%hu\n", &dev_id);
>
> Hmm. I have a general dislike of pulling part name strings apart to
> get
> IDs. It tends to break when someone comes along and adds a part with
> new
> branding. Perhaps just put it in the relevant device part specific
> structures
> directly?
>
I'll admit that this to orientated to ADI devices and I basically just
took what all the drivers were doing and placed it inside the
library...
So, you mean passing this to each `chip_info` and then passing it to
the library through `adis_data`?
> > + if (ret != 1)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (prod_id != dev_id)
> > + dev_warn(&adis->spi->dev,
> > + "Device ID(%u) and product ID(%u) do not
> > match.",
> > + dev_id, prod_id);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(adis_initial_startup);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__adis_initial_startup);
> >
> > /**
> > * adis_single_conversion() - Performs a single sample conversion
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iio/imu/adis.h
> > b/include/linux/iio/imu/adis.h
> > index d21a013d1122..c43e7922ab32 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iio/imu/adis.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iio/imu/adis.h
> > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct adis_timeout {
> > * @glob_cmd_reg: Register address of the GLOB_CMD register
> > * @msc_ctrl_reg: Register address of the MSC_CTRL register
> > * @diag_stat_reg: Register address of the DIAG_STAT register
> > + * @prod_id_reg: Register address of the PROD_ID register
> > * @self_test_reg: Register address to request self test command
> > * @status_error_msgs: Array of error messgaes
> > * @status_error_mask:
> > @@ -54,6 +55,7 @@ struct adis_data {
> > unsigned int glob_cmd_reg;
> > unsigned int msc_ctrl_reg;
> > unsigned int diag_stat_reg;
> > + unsigned int prod_id_reg;
> >
> > unsigned int self_test_mask;
> > unsigned int self_test_reg;
> > @@ -299,6 +301,7 @@ static inline int adis_read_reg_32(struct adis
> > *adis, unsigned int reg,
> >
> > int adis_enable_irq(struct adis *adis, bool enable);
> > int __adis_check_status(struct adis *adis);
> > +int __adis_initial_startup(struct adis *adis);
> >
> > static inline int adis_check_status(struct adis *adis)
> > {
> > @@ -311,7 +314,17 @@ static inline int adis_check_status(struct
> > adis *adis)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -int adis_initial_startup(struct adis *adis);
> > +/* locked version of __adis_initial_startup() */
> > +static inline int adis_initial_startup(struct adis *adis)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&adis->state_lock);
> > + ret = __adis_initial_startup(adis);
> > + mutex_unlock(&adis->state_lock);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> >
> > int adis_single_conversion(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > const struct iio_chan_spec *chan, unsigned int error_mask,
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
