On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 02:25:51PM +0100, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 2:11 PM Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 14:04 +0100, gli...@google.com wrote: > > > Certain copy_from_user() invocations in binder.c are known to > > > unconditionally initialize locals before their first use, like e.g. in > > > the following case: > > [] > > > diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c > > [] > > > @@ -3788,7 +3788,7 @@ static int binder_thread_write(struct binder_proc > > > *proc, > > > > > > case BC_TRANSACTION_SG: > > > case BC_REPLY_SG: { > > > - struct binder_transaction_data_sg tr; > > > + struct binder_transaction_data_sg tr > > > __no_initialize; > > > > > > if (copy_from_user(&tr, ptr, sizeof(tr))) > > > > I fail to see any value in marking tr with __no_initialize > > when it's immediately written to by copy_from_user. > > This is being done exactly because it's immediately written to by > copy_to_user() > Clang is currently unable to figure out that copy_to_user() initializes > memory. ^^ typo s/to/from/.
It feels more useful to annotate copy_from_user(). That would be useful for Smatch as well. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel