On 4/23/20 2:29 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:41:12AM +0300, Ivan Safonov wrote:
skb clones use same data buffer, so tail of one skb is corrupted by beginning
of next skb.
Please properly wrap your changelog text at the correct column (72).
Also, your subject: line does not have the correct driver name :(
Correct driver name is 'r8188eu':
1.
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2016-June/090556.html
:
One other point, it is customary to start the patch subject with "staging:
rtl8188eu: ..." for drivers in staging. I also prefer using r8188eu rather than
rtl8188eu as the former is the actual name of the driver, but either will work.
2. ./drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c lines 483-522/522 (END):
static struct usb_driver rtl8188e_usb_drv = {
.name = "r8188eu",
.probe = rtw_drv_init,
.disconnect = rtw_dev_remove,
.id_table = rtw_usb_id_tbl,
.suspend = rtw_suspend,
.resume = rtw_resume,
.reset_resume = rtw_resume,
};
module_usb_driver(rtl8188e_usb_drv)
Subject contain this name.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Safonov <insafo...@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c | 19 ++++++-------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c
b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c
index d4278361e002..a036ef104198 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c
@@ -1525,21 +1525,14 @@ static int amsdu_to_msdu(struct adapter *padapter,
struct recv_frame *prframe)
/* Allocate new skb for releasing to upper layer */
sub_skb = dev_alloc_skb(nSubframe_Length + 12);
- if (sub_skb) {
- skb_reserve(sub_skb, 12);
- skb_put_data(sub_skb, pdata, nSubframe_Length);
- } else {
- sub_skb = skb_clone(prframe->pkt, GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (sub_skb) {
- sub_skb->data = pdata;
- sub_skb->len = nSubframe_Length;
- skb_set_tail_pointer(sub_skb, nSubframe_Length);
- } else {
- DBG_88E("skb_clone() Fail!!! ,
nr_subframes=%d\n", nr_subframes);
- break;
- }
+ if (!sub_skb) {
+ DBG_88E("dev_alloc_skb() Fail!!! , nr_subframes=%d\n",
nr_subframes);
+ break;
}
+ skb_reserve(sub_skb, 12);
+ skb_put_data(sub_skb, pdata, nSubframe_Length);
+
Have you tested this?
I have not test this change.
Ivan Safonov.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
