On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 05:13:19PM +0100, John Oldman wrote:
> Fixed coding style issue
No you didn't :)
>
> Signed-off-by: John Oldman <john.old...@polehill.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c
> b/drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c
> index 14592ed9ce98..dd35d0bce6ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ struct mtk_hsdam_engine {
> struct device_dma_parameters dma_parms;
> void __iomem *base;
> struct tasklet_struct task;
> +
> volatile unsigned long chan_issued;
>
> struct mtk_hsdma_chan chan[1];
This file seems to be the "does the submitter look at the patch they are
sending" litmus test.
Does that really do what you think it does?
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
