The soc_camera driver obsolete and depends on BROKEN. And in fact, I'm
working on removing it. So I'll drop this patch for those reasons.

Regards,

        Hans

On 25/06/2020 17:35, B K Karthik wrote:
> staging: media: soc_camera: soc_camera.c: Clearing coding-style problem
> "Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses" in line 241 by 
> adding parentheses.
> staging: media: soc_camera: soc_camera.c: Clearing coding-style problem
> "Alignment should match open parenthesis" by adding tab spaces in line 410.
> staging: media: soc_camera: soc_camera.c: Clearing coding-style problem
> "return of an errno should typically be negative" by adding a "-" in front of 
> EPOLLER in line 812.
> staging: media: soc_camera: soc_camera.c: Clearing coding-style problem
> "Alignment should match open parenthesis" by adding tab spaces in line 1270.
> 
> Signed-off-by: B K Karthik <karthik.bk2...@live.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/media/soc_camera/soc_camera.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/soc_camera/soc_camera.c 
> b/drivers/staging/media/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> index 39f513f69b89..66a14ebd8093 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> @@ -238,8 +238,8 @@ unsigned long soc_camera_apply_board_flags(struct 
> soc_camera_subdev_desc *ssdd,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(soc_camera_apply_board_flags);
>  
> -#define pixfmtstr(x) (x) & 0xff, ((x) >> 8) & 0xff, ((x) >> 16) & 0xff, \
> -     ((x) >> 24) & 0xff
> +#define pixfmtstr(x) ((x) & 0xff, ((x) >> 8) & 0xff, ((x) >> 16) & 0xff, \
> +     ((x) >> 24) & 0xff)
>  
>  static int soc_camera_try_fmt(struct soc_camera_device *icd,
>                             struct v4l2_format *f)
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static int soc_camera_dqbuf(struct file *file, void *priv,
>  }
>  
>  static int soc_camera_create_bufs(struct file *file, void *priv,
> -                         struct v4l2_create_buffers *create)
> +                                     struct v4l2_create_buffers *create)
>  {
>       struct soc_camera_device *icd = file->private_data;
>       int ret;
> @@ -806,10 +806,10 @@ static __poll_t soc_camera_poll(struct file *file, 
> poll_table *pt)
>  {
>       struct soc_camera_device *icd = file->private_data;
>       struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
> -     __poll_t res = EPOLLERR;
> +     __poll_t res = -EPOLLERR;
>  
>       if (icd->streamer != file)
> -             return EPOLLERR;
> +             return -EPOLLERR;
>  
>       mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
>       res = ici->ops->poll(file, pt);
> @@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ static int soc_camera_i2c_init(struct soc_camera_device 
> *icd,
>       }
>  
>       subdev = v4l2_i2c_new_subdev_board(&ici->v4l2_dev, adap,
> -                             shd->board_info, NULL);
> +                                             shd->board_info, NULL);
>       if (!subdev) {
>               ret = -ENODEV;
>               goto ei2cnd;
> 

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to