On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Grant Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 26, 2008, at 8:40 AM, Baron Schwartz wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Grant Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Any thoughts on supporting milliseconds in DATETIME fields? In my >>> professional line of work, I've run across several situations in the >>> analysis of aircraft flight tracks where radar systems have a millisecond >>> resolution. On MySQL I've always had to break the datetime provided by >>> the >>> radar systems into two fields, one datetime, and one integer in order to >>> hold on to the millisecond data. My preferred solution would be to have >>> the >>> data stored in the DATETIME field itself. I haven't dug into the >>> DATETIME >>> data type code yet, but it shouldn't be too incredibly difficult to >>> implement. Does anyone else see this as a useful feature? >> >> Yes. And microseconds, too. Nanoseconds? > > Sure. We'll throw in the kitchen sink while we're at it :) >
Well, microseconds are easy, but I'm not sure about nanoseconds, especially cross-platform :) Baron _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
