++ Baron Schwartz wrote: > One thing I'd like to mention, which may be a moot point, is that the > days of second-level granularity should be put behind us. Especially > "in the cloud." > > What I mean is that logging the date and time of queries, for example, > should not be at second-level granularity. Not just the elapsed > execution time -- but the time the event itself occurred. It should > be in microseconds. > > The processlist should not show seconds, it should show microseconds. > > Replication lag shouldn't be seconds_behind_master, it should be > microseconds. (I know, replication is being ripped out...) > > Anywhere there's a timestamp is probably a candidate for greater > precision. I don't know if the question about a native timestamp type > with microsecond precision was ever resolved -- but I'm sure that is a > prerequisite :) > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > Post to : drizzle-discuss@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : drizzle-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
