On Mar 22, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Brian Aker wrote: > Hi! > > On Mar 22, 2010, at 4:59 PM, Arjen Lentz wrote: > >> I reckon that for tools like this, it'd make sense to have the raw docu >> embedded in the source code. > > I've found that having the documentation in the code is pretty much the worst > location for it. You can't then have documentation people work on it, because > they have to deal with source code.
Yeah I'd have to agree. Some coders are DBAs but some DBAs aren't coders. The documentation definitely needs to live somewhere but I dunno if at least usage docs should live there. On an aside, anything that can be done to make drizzledump faster than mysqldump would be awesome. mysqldump is quite painfully slow. Perhaps that was more MySQL itself but it's definitely something I'd love to see fixed. Tim S. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
