On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:09:58 -0400, Tom Hanlon <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24 Mar 2010, at 19:47, Stewart Smith wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:06:27 -0400, Jay Pipes <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> I think it's unreasonable to have every plugin ever built live in the > >> Drizzle mainline. > > > > linux-kernel manages it... and it has a great many more of them. We > > should scale in number of contributors able to do some review along > > with > > number of plugins. > > > > Does the linux kernel keep every plugin or module that was ever > "built" live in the mainline.. Or do they keep every plugin that has > an active maintainer in the mainline.
That has an active maintainer.... or until it's too burdensome to maintain it. > I think you would need aggressive enforcement of maintainers for each > plugin.. if you enforce that.. No maintainer or it goes.. rule then > you can. That would be the idea. If it stagnates and we know it hasn't worked for 12 months... and nobody has even complained... it's gone :) -- Stewart Smith _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
