Hi ZQ!
I am reviewing his patch right now so I will have some comments on this
shortly. The work is really straight forward.
Cheers,
-Brian
On May 11, 2010, at 6:49 PM, ZQ wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> /me espouses the usefulness of blueprints...
>
> Do we have a blueprint for this work? If not, Wei and Zimin, I'd be
> happy to walk you through creating one, assigning it to yourself, and
> the general process of completing one...
>
> Let me know,
>
>
> I've just registered one blueprint for it.
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/drizzle/+spec/key-value-pass-down-to-storage-engine
>
> The current status is the path from sql statement to storage engine is ok,
> and one specific storage engine can reject it or ack it as Brian has
> suggested.
>
> In Stewart's original implementation, such abilities are given to 'create
> database', do we need this as well, I'm curious?
>
> Currently, table.proto is not changed. The key-value pair uses EngineOption
> to hold the information. Do we need some refactoring in this table.proto?
> e.g. merge TableOption with EngineOption so that it can be more consistent?
>
>
> Thanks.
> --ziminq
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : drizzle-discuss@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
