On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:24 AM, PaweÅ‚ Blokus <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've finally finished writing tests for the temporal.cc
> temporal_format.cc and temporal_interval.cc files.

Well done, Pawel!

> I've learned a lot during the first weeks of GSoC and one of the more
> important lessons would be that it's easy to underestimate the
> necessary time :) I won't start work on multiple files anymore, unless
> they're really tightly connected. This will allow me to send at least
> one report a week which I assumed at the start. Also, since I won't
> have to experiment with the testing framework that much I hope work
> will go faster.

Yes, it will.  There is still a fairly steep learning curve for
developers first starting work on Drizzle, and you're doing a good job
so far. :)

> Also, I will probably learn a lot after the first review, any comments
> regarding especially readability (test names, usage of fixtures etc.)
> will be welcome.

I look forward to it!

> I've experienced some issues with the testing framework while creating
> parameterized tests. For some reason it doesn't do all the necessary
> declarations. I fixed this by simply pasting the declaration from the
> compiler error but I know that it's just a temporary solution. I have
> no idea what this might be related to.

Is this related to our use of strict compilation flags?  Or something else?

> During the incoming days/weeks I will be working on the plugin
> interfaces. One at a time of course :)

Looking forward to it! :)

Cheers,

jay

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to