Hi Marcus, On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Marcus Eriksson <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not support both strategies using different replicator plugins for > example?
This is handled deep in the Drizzle kernel, and the current implementation wasn't designed with the ability for plugins to handle this portion of work. > I'm guessing it is a matter of where you want to do the extra work of > buffering, the actual logic would be the same if it is done on the slave or > the master, right? Right, except the master takes a performance hit due to having to introduce locks around the stream. So we're kind of leaning towards having downstream handle the buffering so we can avoid the concurrency issues. -Dave _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
