Hi guys,
OK, so I am cleaning up a bunch of options on the client apps and
realise that all the client apps have a compression protocol option but
libdrizzle doesn't implement the compression protocol. So do we:
1. Add compression to libdrizzle
or
2. Remove the (currently dead) option from the client apps.
I guess my argument for 1 is to save bandwidth on networks with busy
drizzle servers (push more data down a pipe). Not only for remote
networks but I am guessing in a cloud scenario network saturation could
be possible. This should help accelerate remote backup scenarios using
drizzledump for example.
Kind Regards
--
Andrew Hutchings - LinuxJedi - http://www.linuxjedi.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
