Hi Stewart, I think the only issue would be with the 'pbms' database which is the folder where the PBMS daemon keeps it's BLOB repository for the entire database server. There are also a couple of system tables in this database that users can update that effect the PBMS daemon.
Are catalogs virtual or are they reflected in the directory structure on the machine. Barry On 4/7/11 7:14 PM, "Stewart Smith" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Barry (and others), > > I've been working on getting CATALOG support into drizzle. > > basically, instead of schema/table_name it's going to be > catalog/schema/table_name. With a new CatalogIdentifier and if an engine > constructs its own paths (and doesn't just ask the TableIdentifier for > one), then it needs to be changed. > > At least with the PBMS in tree, it's getting out the db name and table > name and constructing a path based on that (for something, didn't look > too close) so that with my lp:~stewart/drizzle/use-catalog-for-path > branch, pbms.basic test fails (currently the only test failing there). > > What would be your preferred method of dealing with this and making PBMS > also work with catalogs? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Barry Leslie SNAP Innovation Softwareentwicklung GmbH Senior Software Engineer Tel: (001) 250 884 1820 Fax: (001) 250 595 4460 Email: [email protected] Web: www.PrimeBase.org SNAP Innovation Softwareentwicklung GmbH, D-22765 Hamburg, Max-Brauer-Allee 50, Germany Amtsgericht Hamburg HRB 61066, Geschäftsführer: Ulrich Zimmer, Paul McCullagh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
