Well, I haven't gotten around to testing the INSERT performance on my own. I still recall it being quite fast, so I want to revisit those and determine why I was getting higher numbers. All that said, it had a niche and still had better compression than InnoDB when I used it so yeah I would like to see it in there, though I'll admit the use cases for it are rather tiny.
On Apr 18, 2011, at 6:42 PM, Brian Aker wrote: > Hi! > > On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Tim Soderstrom wrote: > >> ARCHIVE go since it's INSERT performance is so fast > > If there was a big push I'd be up for considering its return. Drizzle had a > slightly more modern version then what MySQL has but I haven't put any love > into it in a couple of years. If I was to ever redo it, I'd actually design > it around being schema less. > > Cheers, > -Brian > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
