On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Tim Soderstrom <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'd prefer a solution that's as simple as the original. > > Well, I mean, then use MySQL :)
I am. But even in MySQL this usage conflicts with strict mode. > Those features were removed from Drizzle for a reason (and probably a very > good one) Probably? IMO (bulk) data updates should be a first class citizen of a DBMS. > but if you're application doesn't fit and you're not willing to modify it, > then I would suggest you use something that fits your requirements. I'd rather modify Drizzle. :p -- Olaf _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
