-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 3/28/11 6:03 PM, Stewart Smith wrote: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:30:48 -0400, Greg Larkin <[email protected]> wrote: >> One thing I remember from creating the port a while back is that Drizzle >> had a large number of configure-time options. Does it still have them, >> and how important is it that they are exposed to the end user before the >> build? The FreeBSD ports system has a text-based options selector that >> they can be added to, but if there's a common set that should be >> enabled, I can just hardcode them in the port Makefile. > > For the most part, most of the plugins with dependencies can be built if > the dependencies are installed and otherwise it doesn't matter (can't > remember how this maps back to FreeBSD ports...). For the most part, the > default ./configure options should be fine. >
Hello all, After a bit of a delay, I want to let you know that I'm working on upgrading the FreeBSD port of drizzle to the latest version. If I run into any questions, I'll ping you along the way. One question I have now regards the current status of libdrizzle. It appears to be folded into the main drizzle distro, so I expect I can remove it from the drizzle port as a dependency. Is there any need to keep the libdrizzle port around for standalone use at this point? If not, I'll set it to DEPRECATED and eventually remove it from the tree. Thank you, Greg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk25s7QACgkQ0sRouByUApBg9QCdF/+kkS89mMQNYdOvVOJprteF ERcAn1B3hhLV/hVjXfP4CUnNe+eMkaLV =7ue0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
