On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Daniel Nichter <[email protected]> wrote: >> Even if most of the current content on the wiki will fit in the >> manual, we may still want to keep a wiki as a place where we can >> co-author stuff, scribble notes and project plans and such. (Unless we >> can get such functionality from google sites or elsewhere.) > > True, but then I think it should be private, not accessible by search engines > so users don't wind up at wiki notes and take them to be authoritative, > current, or accurate. >
Maybe not private, we don't want to raise the threshold for new participants. (Also: google is often the best interface into many sites I use :-) But I agree with the problem you raise. Maybe add some sort of labeling on each wiki page or something. Btw, it seems you have now actively taken upon you to get the content moved to docs. I'll do something else then (play with the new JSON parser perhaps...). Let me know if you need a hand. I don't think there are that many pages to move anyways. henrik -- [email protected] +358-40-8211286 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo www.openlife.cc My LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=9522559 _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
