On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Henrik Ingo <[email protected]> wrote: >> A dependency on Boost appears to be unwanted for the client lib. > > I don't get why. Still the question remains - if Boost is unwanted for
Me neither. > the client, what additional benefit does the parser provide to > drizzled. It would make more sense that all components use one and the > same parser to read the same config file. (Ie, if client can't use > Boost, then drizzled should use the home grown one.) Boost Program Options is fine for the server, so there's no reason to replace that one (IMO). Olaf _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
