On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Olaf van der Spek <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Olaf van der Spek > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Brian Aker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> @Olaf I'd leave the atomic implementation alone. This is an area where in >>> the future someone could want what you are removing (and what has tests). >> >> I'll restore the tests to test the pthread implementation. > > Actually, (I also asked Monty), what's the point in testing atomics > you're not going to use?
Brian? -- Olaf _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
