Ah sorry, I just asked a question and didn't read all my emails to
find out you already answered it.

Anyway, in the other thread I outlined a proposal where libdrizzle
releases would still mostly coincide and use same versions as the
server (while also providing lp:libdrizzle for people that want to
build from source).

Yeah, we can do it also the other way: not package libdrizzle in
lp:drizzle related packages. To me this sounds messy, but it depends
on what we need/want from lp:libdrizzle.

henrik

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Brian Aker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We could choose to not install the version of libdrizzle that we ship with 
> the server. Or,... put it into a different directory on install....
>
> Cheers,
>        -Brian
>
> On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:42 AM, Henrik Ingo wrote:
>
>> Ah. Turns out this isn't feasible. Of course if using just one spec
>> file, all packages coming out of it will end up with the same version
>> number.
>>
>> So we can:
>>
>> - separate libdrizzle packaging completely. This is problematic
>> because when installing the server you'd want to install the client
>> too. Otoh if installing from a yum/apt repo it doesn't matter, it's
>> just complexity for us when building and testing.
>>
>> - keep libdrizzle and drizzled together and make them use same
>> version number. If there is a need to do libdrizzle releases more
>> frequently than the server, it is possible to do a release that
>> contains just libdrizzle. However, the next server release would then
>> have to skip a build number.
>>
>>
>> I have to think about it. I suppose at this point we should question
>> whether we really need to do independent libdrizzle releases? If we
>> continue releasing the server once a month, isn't that enough? Or is
>> it a problem to release also the server more frequently if there's a
>> need for a libdrizzle release?
>>
>> Seems like giving up on independent libdrizzle releases would solve
>> many problems. (There could still be a tarball from where you can make
>> libdrizzle without the server, just that the version numbers would be
>> strictly coupled.)
>>
>> henrik
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Henrik Ingo <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Brian
>>>
>>> I was thinking about how to package the libdrizzle breakout
>>> (lp:libdrizzle) for rpms and debs.
>>>
>>> It occured to me the simplest answer is to not do it at all. At least
>>> to start with. Since the master repo will still remain at lp:drizzle,
>>> we could choose to just provide rpm and deb updates when there is a
>>> complete new drizzle release. Interim libdrizzle releases, should they
>>> occur, would be source only.
>>>
>>> This allows us to simply continue using the rpm and deb packaging
>>> that's already approved for merging. They already produce a separate
>>> libdrizzle rpm/deb (as part of the whole build).
>>>
>>> henrik
>>> --
>>> [email protected]
>>> +358-40-8211286 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo
>>> www.openlife.cc
>>>
>>> My LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=9522559
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> [email protected]
>> +358-40-8211286 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo
>> www.openlife.cc
>>
>> My LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=9522559
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPNIxDAAoJEItO41/aJIgTtxoIAN9E27Ndn2V4w8s9d3uA+Zro
> TkBAGM0th/6jpiSoj/68Lkpu6OjDlVCLVwZfXveYO0fQqF+zoX0iRbTuj6dpwr/W
> VGxNPrwKa1n3hwz/FhMm6vORfLDCLw1etfFQtUabhzVBTmhao29KFNJgtlce1W2E
> 2aVU5blwafNK49lhWfcbY19ATDMwhtwI1v5qHlI31YYJ/F5SpGeqMx+nfXB23nMp
> dqLhK5jQLQfBHNt5KgtblGLADSv4E8TxiMMzRBv1+rBQZhPeWJAea48ASuIH013h
> t9p6Xj4+KZezJtMf1TkgAXyedvLG/QAMJ1opXX7CsQJ2RsZtWi13jTWb6X1JslA=
> =1oyr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



-- 
[email protected]
+358-40-8211286 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo
www.openlife.cc

My LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=9522559

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to