I'm guessing the failure is related to the flush that brian added (which was a great idea, btw) I could fix it with a record, but I'm not sure that's 100% the right move?
On 12/16/2010 07:53 AM, Lee Bieber wrote: > I've pushed staging to trunk, however Monty you will need to look at the > failures in build. > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Brian Aker <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi! > > In trunk we had a regression that was flagged in valgrind in later > runs. I've pointed out to Andrew which patch it was and I have > applied a reverse patch on top of the tree in order to save us from > having to deal with a bad trunk. > > I've pushed through the rename on three DD tables. In staging is > field work/uuid. In build is Monty's error patches with a couple of > concurrent fixes I found in the logging_stat tests. I am hoping that > in the morning: > 1) uuid is finished and good to push to trunk. > 2) No issues showed up with monty's tests. I run the logging tests > with --mem and --repeat=10 in order to see if anything would show up. > > Cheers, > -Brian > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-merge > <https://launchpad.net/%7Edrizzle-merge> > Post to : [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-merge > <https://launchpad.net/%7Edrizzle-merge> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-merge Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-merge More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
