On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 11:33 -0600, Henri Yandell wrote: > Why 'install package' btw? I thought install was "package + put in .m2". >
No reason. 'mvn install' should indeed be sufficient Oleg > Builds fine for me. > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 01:58 +0100, Thorsten Scherler wrote: > >> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 17:36 -0500, Ryan McKinley wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Oleg, if you are comfortable with maven, can you give that a crack? > >> > >> If not -- i will try to throw something together > >> > >> > >> > >> ryan > >> > > > >> > > Sure. If you can live with the Ant build being completely broken > >> > > while I > >> > > am busy moving stuff around, I can take of the basic Maven setup. > >> > > > >> > > I also think It should be feasible to use maven to manage dependencies > >> > > and build component artifacts (jars) while using Ant to generate > >> > > release > >> > > packages and manage web site content. > >> > > > >> > > Would that work for you, guys? > >> > > > >> > > >> > sounds great. Thanks! > >> > >> Yeah, perfect. > >> > >> Awesome. :) > >> > >> BTW IMO the build had been broken for a while actually so no worries. > >> > >> salu2 > >> > > > > Folks > > > > I laid out the basic Maven compliant multi-module project structure and > > created two modules: Droids Core and Droids Dynamic. Core was set up > > according to the Maven guidelines. The structure of Dymanic was left > > intact, albeit it took a bit more verbose pom.xml to get it to work with > > Maven. Given these examples you can compare and evaluate the two > > approaches. > > > > To build Droids run 'mvn install package' > > > > Ant builds are utterly broken. > > > > As the next step I am going to move Norobots stuff to a separate module. > > > > Please review the changes and assess the damage done so far. > > > > Evil Comrade Oleg > > > > > >
