On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 12:26 -0500, Ryan McKinley wrote: > On Nov 22, 2008, at 7:32 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 13:07 -0500, Ryan McKinley wrote: ... > >> > >> Any thoughts on JMX and droids? > >> > >> ryan > > > > Ryan, > > > > I have no experience working with JMX but I am certainly in favor of > > not > > reinventing the wheel. Could we keep the dependency on JMX optional > > for > > Droids Core, though? > > > > JMX is already included in the Java SE platform (java 6 has a lot more > in it though) -- so adding JMX to core would not change the > dependencies. > > I have not really looked into it yet, so I'm not really sure what the > implications are. My hunch is that 'core' would implement some > standard interfaces (MBean etc). If the any droids specific JMX > management classes are non-trivial, then they should be moved to > their own module.
Yeah, +1 for jmx. I thought about jmx for the controlling/administration task a while ago but never dived into jmx. salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org> Open Source Java <consulting, training and solutions>
