I agree. We have to release. The changes I'd like to contribute back are the following.
- TaskQueue repleaced by java.util.Queue - Handling process reviewed. - Factory pattern only used for Worker - Extractors inherit from Handler => no need to parse the document twice - Entity renamed in Identifier - ContentEntity renamed in Resource - Crawler moved to droids-crawler - Parser moved to droids-parser - Walker moved to droids-walker - The walker also use an Extractor - some minor changes On 8 February 2011 10:32, Thorsten Scherler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 09:50 +0100, Chapuis Bertil wrote: > > In previous emails and jira comments I saw several people mentionning the > > fact they have a local copy of droids which evolved too much to be merged > > back with the trunk. This is my case, and I think Paul Rogalinski is in > the > > same situation. > > > > Since the patches have only been applied periodically on the trunk during > > the last months, I'd love to know if someone else is in the same > situation > > and what can of changes they made locally. > > I am not sure but I see it like you describe. > > IMO we should release what we have right now and then plan how to merge > back all this different versions into a new droids version. > > IMO the next droids version should focus on ease of reuse and a droid > server which starts and monitors the different droids. > > To start with: > * who has a version of droids which (s)he is interested to merge back > * what are the main difference between the forge and the "original" > * ... > > salu2 > -- > Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org> > codeBusters S.L. - web based systems > <consulting, training and solutions> > http://www.codebusters.es/ >
