Sorry for such a question, but I'm not sure to understand why we need a zip for the source release, since we already have the jars generated by the maven source plugin.
About the site, the trunk contains the forrest documentation and the foundation for using the maven site plugin (src/site). It seems that storing the site in the src folder is a common practice but if the source archive is required, having two sites in it is not good. On 18 May 2011 22:54, Richard Frovarp <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/18/2011 03:44 PM, Eugen Paraschiv wrote: > >> I've been using the new incubator code for this past few days, without any >> discernible *functional *problems for me. The 7 days voting period is >> getting close to the end, what is the next step from here? >> Thanks for moving this forward. >> Eugen. >> >> > Glad to hear. Personally, I'm not happy with the actual release artifacts. > I should have paid closer attention when generating them. If anyone has > feedback on what needs to change in the release artifacts, that would be > great. > > I've already fixed the missing license headers in trunk. > > I've moved the code modules out of trunk that aren't referenced in the root > pom. > > I will do a clean checkout so there isn't extra SVN crap in the source > file. > > The one piece that is still missing is moving the website out of trunk. If > this isn't done, we're shipping our website in the source archives that are > made available for download. > > -- Bertil Chapuis Agimem Sàrl http://www.agimem.com
