Yah, that's about what I've gotten out of the proposal.
I see that it narrowly got approved, "with strong reservations" from most of the voting members. But still, what does it mean? Is it a standardization of the assert(..) retract(..) and modify(..) actions of working with facts within a working memory? Or is it even higher-level of loadRule(..) types of things? I just don't have enough details to really decide. Chances are, once the spec is released, I'll try to conform, unless it's a brain-dead JSR, like the EJB spec. ;) (yes, I'm a tad punchy and will probably start a flame war with that, but...) -bob On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Stuart Schmukler wrote: > Bob, > > As I understand it JSR 92 is now a standard API > for controling a rules engine. The language of the > rules engine is not specified. The RuleML work is > an attempt to create a common XML based rules language. > > Stuart Schmukler (SaS) > > > _______________________________________________ > drools-interest mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest > _______________________________________________ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest