I think a big difference is that drools is free and open-source. Jess is NOT!
Performance ( if it is an issue ) can be fixed. Dave On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, bob mcwhirter wrote: > > To be honest, no clue. > > JESS still seems non-OO, to me, in that you're still writing > cambridge-prefix types of rules. It's interpreted, as > is the Java Semantic Module of drools, so it may be similar. > > I do think JESS has highly optimized their Rete network, > though, so they may beat us. > > Someone want to do some benchmarking for us? > > -bob > (the great delegator) > > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Dhanwa Thirumalai wrote: > > > Another java 'rete' engine JESS is getting popular. How does drools > > compare with Jess in terms performance and functionality? > > > > Dhanwa. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > drools-interest mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest > > > > > _______________________________________________ > drools-interest mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest > -- Dave Bryson [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
