On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 at 22:06:20 +0800, Matt Johnston wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote: >> That's great, thanks! While I'm at it, please also consider excluding >> mercurial dotfiles from the tarballs: > > Do they cause a problem? At least hg_archival.txt is kind of > useful to see which hg revision made the tarball.
Nah I guess they are harmless; now that you say it hg_archival.txt can
be useful indeed, and in fact lintian(1) only complains about .hgtags:
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-contains-hg-tags-file.html
--
Guilhem.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
