Hi, On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Donald Eastlake <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We had this same discussion before RFC 1750 and before RFC 4086. I > would agree that it should emphasize the right thing to do more than > it emphasizes the wrong thing to do. And I'd be fine with relegating > what not to do to an appendix or something. But I'm not willing to > dump the information from the draft about what not to do. I totally agree. A list of known bad practices can provide ammunition to the poor software engineers out there to convince management that fixing the RNG in $PRODUCT is warranted. Deviance from current best practices is often not enough to sell software development with no revenue potential to MBA types. My 2 cents from working for an enterprise software vendor. Alex
_______________________________________________ dsfjdssdfsd mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dsfjdssdfsd
