Good morning,

Right now, RedHat has only version 1.2.1-7 available for RHEL5.  Is this 
something that can be made available with maven?  

The later version is also in Jpackage, but we're cautious about relying too 
heavily on outside repos.  We've had some dependency nightmares going that 
route.

B--

>>> On 11/3/2010 at 10:31 AM, in message
<882dc7d8-2155-42bd-af06-a938f12dd...@mit.edu>, Sands Alden Fish
<sa...@mit.edu> wrote:
> If no one has any opposition to this, I'd like to upgrade commons-dbcp to the 
> latest version before 1.7 is cut.
> 
> --
> sands fish
> Senior Software Engineer
> MIT Libraries
> Technology Research & Development
> sa...@mit.edu<mailto:sa...@mit.edu>
> E25-131
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 23, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Sands Alden Fish wrote:
> 
> So Graham, is that a yes?  :)
> 
> I am not familiar with the side-effects or refactoring/adjusting that would 
> be necessary for such a change so I can't quite comment on how feasible it is 
> for 1.7.
> 
> 
> --
> sands fish
> Software Engineer
> MIT Libraries
> Technology Research & Development
> sa...@mit.edu<mailto:sa...@mit.edu>
> E25-131
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 23, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Graham Triggs wrote:
> 
> If you want stability, then all JDBC classes - including DBCP (which is 
> itself a DataSource / driver wrapper) - should be pushed down / delegated to 
> the common Tomcat classloader.
> 
> This would be necessary for JNDI configurations, but more importantly all 
> JDBC drivers register into the JVM wider DriverManager.
> 
> In itself, you might get away without it being the cause of stability 
> issues, but it will prevent you from ensuring the web application classloader 
> can be disposed of cleanly - which will prevent you finding other likely 
> stability problems.
> 
> G
> 
> On 23 September 2010 21:05, Sands Alden Fish 
><sa...@mit.edu<mailto:sa...@mit.edu>> wrote:
> There are quite a significant amount of bugs fixed in the 1.4 version of 
> commons-dbcp.
> 
>    http://commons.apache.org/dbcp/changes-report.html#a1.4 
> 
> Considering it is such a central library to DSpace, and since we are, 
> pursuing enhanced stability, it would seem to make sense to pick up this 
> version for 1.7.
> 
> Peter and others?  Does anyone have a reason we shouldn't use the more 
> recent version of this dependency?
> 
> 
> --
> sands fish
> Software Engineer
> MIT Libraries
> Technology Research & Development
> sa...@mit.edu<mailto:sa...@mit.edu>
> E25-131
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
> Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in  U.S. and Canada
> $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing
> Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev 
> _______________________________________________
> Dspace-devel mailing list
> Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel 
> 
> 
> 
> <ATT00001..c><ATT00002..c>
> 
> <ATT00001..c><ATT00002..c>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper
David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a 
Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your 
business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel

Reply via email to