Discovery-based search results displaying in opposite order
-----------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: DS-1071
                 URL: https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/DS-1071
             Project: DSpace
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Discovery, Solr, XMLUI
    Affects Versions: 1.7.2
         Environment: Red Hat, Java 1.6.0_26, discovery-enabled dspace instance
            Reporter: Patrick K. Etienne


Discovery-based (relevancy) search results are being returned in an order of 
least-relevant to greatest relevance (ascending) - even though the interface 
shows that default search results will be displayed in descending order.

I'm running on DSpace 1.7.2 (with discovery enabled) and have tested on two 
different dspace instances with different themes (both custom and prefab), and 
within two very different data sets. To reproduce the issue I'm mentioning, all 
that needs to be done is a simple search from within two different search 
forms. For example, using the Mirage theme in dspace 1.7.2 follow these steps:

1) Open two browser tabs - tabA and tabB
2) In tabA navigate to the root (home) page of your dspace instance (you can 
use either the main column or side column search areas).
3) In tabB navigate to the advanced search page of your dspace instance (we'll 
be using the main [left-hand] column search area).
4) Choose a term to search for with both search areas. I used "access" because 
I knew it was in my data set(s).
5) Enter your search term within the tabA search area and submit the form.
6) Enter that same search term within the tabB search area and submit the form.

At this point you will notice that the search results are not the same, or more 
precisely (if you have less than 10 results you'll notice this more easily) the 
results are in opposing orders.

7) On the tabB page, notice that the sort options' "in order" box, the default 
listing is "descending".
8) On the tabB page, select "ascending" in the "in order" box, then re-submit 
the form. Note that the order of results is reversed.
9) On the tabA page, select "ascending" in the "in order" box, then re-submit 
the form. Note that the order of results is not changed (they were already in 
ascending order).
10) On the tabA page, go back to "descending" in the "in order" box, then 
re-submit the form. Notice that now the order of results is reversed.

At this point I'm going to assume that the numerical system representing 
relevancy is of the flavor that the higher the number, the more relevant the 
item record is to the search term(s). If this is the case, I believe that would 
mean that descending order would be the more "correct" default display of 
search results in that the most relevant results would be listed at the the top 
or beginning of the list.

With this said, I think the take-away might be that for the "tabA" search areas 
that were mentioned, they default results in an ascending, rather than 
descending order. It seems quite misleading to the user (having results listed 
in ascending order) due to the "in order" comboBox displaying "descending" by 
default.

I used the DuraSpace Jira Issue Navigator to see if anything related to this 
had been entered, but I didn't see anything.

Would it not make more sense to have those "tabA" search areas default to 
displaying relevancy results in descending order?

Many thanks for your attention, and I hope this is helpful.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://jira.duraspace.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel
  • [Dspace-devel] [DuraSpace JI... Patrick K. Etienne (Created) (DuraSpace JIRA)

Reply via email to