Is there any reason why we should not include Pg v9? We've been running very well here on 9.1 for months and months.
Should we not de-recommend v8.3, which is no longer maintained? Indeed, we will be in a peculiar position come next July if we don't support DSpace on Pg v9, when the last 8.x version passes EOL and we, according to current documentation, will no longer support DSpace on any maintained Pg version. I don't recall anyone having serious problems with 9.x, and surely IUPUI is not the only DSpace site running on it. +++++++++++++++++++ Would someone comment on the suitability of our recommended Oracle versions. -- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu Machines should not be friendly. Machines should be obedient.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Dspace-devel mailing list Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel
