On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:07 PM, helix84 <heli...@centrum.sk> wrote:
> Regarding the lack of bundle as a superfluous container

correction: Regarding the bundle as a superfluous container

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Mark H. Wood <mw...@iupui.edu> wrote:
> Community and Collection have different metadata.  We need to think
> about that.

It might, just like an eperson has a different metadata than an item.
But I'm for the single container-type approach.

> Community can't hold Item but Collection can.  So Container would need
> an attribute:  can-hold-Item.  Some sites might want to enforce that
> Items must be pushed down to the lowest level.

For that we could simply have a property indicating whether the
container has any subcontainers or it is a leaf.

Regards,
~~helix84

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel

Reply via email to