Hi Susan, the authorizations should not affect the display of the item in workflow preview or workflow task, the default item display is used.
Did you change something in org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag? What precisely is diplayed when you preview/take a task? The standard item display is used at this point. So you should have a default display with the bitstream list. Claudia Susan Teague Rector schrieb: > Hi Claudia, > > Yesterday afternoon when I was pulling my hair out, I thought this was > probably a customization that we implemented last year. Apparently, no > one testing over the past year has noticed that the file link is gone > during approval (including myself!). We have a strange set up here in > that we did customizations and got the system ready a year ago, but no > one wanted to use it until now... > > I switched the logging to debug mode and noticed that resource policies > are selected before the preview task page is displayed. So I thinking > that the embargo patch that I loaded (and customized) last year to > accommodate our ETDs is the culprit. I've also loaded Tim Donahue's > Configurable Submission system... > > Thanks again for your help - I'll take it from here and email the list > if it's not my own customization bug...eek... > Best, > > Susan > > Claudia Jürgen wrote: >> Hi Susan, >> >> I think this is no authorization problem, but most probably related to >> customization you made, as the bitstream display is not there if I >> understood you right. In a vanilla 1.4.2 the workflow pages are >> displayed correctly. What customizations do you got apart from CSS. >> >> Claudia >> >> >> Susan Teague Rector schrieb: >>> Does anyone know >>> Could this have to do with permissions at the server directory level? >>> Once I approve the item, the file is accessible - it's just in the >>> approval process, I can't access it at all >>> thanks >>> >>> >>> Susan Teague Rector wrote: >>>> Hi Dorothea, >>>> >>>> Thanks for your help! >>>> >>>> All steps have 4 people assigned (including the collection >>>> administrator and the administrator of the system). >>>> >>>> Don't know if this matters, but I'm still using Dspace 1.4.2 and >>>> have Tim's configurable submission system in place. >>>> >>>> susan >>>> >>>> >>>> Dorothea Salo wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Susan Teague Rector >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> No - I thought for sure I had seen a link before - Tis not there... >>>>>> There is a link for the license... >>>>>> >>>>> That's strange. If you edit the collection, which of the three steps >>>>> (Accept/Reject, Accept/Reject/Edit Metadata, Edit Metadata) actually >>>>> has people/groups attached to it? >>>>> >>>>> Dorothea >>>>> >>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. >>>> It's the best place to buy or sell services for >>>> just about anything Open Source. >>>> http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> DSpace-tech mailing list >>>> DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech >>>> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
