On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:11:12PM -0700, Mark Diggory wrote: > In the past I recommended moving dspace-general to the SF site to > assure that its is clearly identified with the DSpace foundation and > community rather than MIT Libraries.
A data point: I had forgotten that dspace-general even existed, since it wasn't visible at SF, until it was recently mentioned on dspace-devel. Housing all of the lists together sounds good to me. (OTOH the SF list archive navigation tools are awful!) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] --> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Um, dspace-admin sounds like "for discussion of administration of DSpace installations". That's certainly not what a commit list is for. ??? > I am concerned that the spawning off of new discussion/chat/email > lists is undermining the communities ability to maintain a > centralized and clearly transparent mechanism for communication. A particular problem with chats is that there is no record of any progress made there unless someone is logging. May I suggest that, in any chat, when consensus or other significant progress is reached, there be a call for a volunteer to write up a summary thereof and post it to a mailing list or the wiki, so that it can be referred back to later or discovered by those not present in the chat. -- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Typically when a software vendor says that a product is "intuitive" he means the exact opposite.
pgpJXnCZlwZ9n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
