Sending this question out again. Could someone verify this. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Jose Blanco <blan...@umich.edu> wrote: > One of our users has loaded an item with one bitstream. He would like > to replace the bitstream to be able to use the same url as the > existing bitstream. I see that if I delete the bitstream and add a > new one, the sequence_id number is increased and the url changes, so I > would like to issue a sql command to change the sequence_id in > bitstream table to the old sequence_id so the url stays the same. I > have tried this in my development environment, and it worked fine. > From looking at the code I don't think this will screw up discovery or > lucene indexing ( I don't see sequence_id being used there), so I > think it is safe to do this. I just want to make sure before I do > this in production. We don't expect this to happen again, and want to > accommodate this user. Could someone verify that doing this will not > screw something else up. > > Many thanks! > Jose
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech List Etiquette: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
