Hi Bram,

Many thanks for this (and for your previous response to my initial questions 
and the link to the extended analysis for my repo) ☺

> 1. Discrepancy in item count

> This should now be fixed. If anyone finds other discrepancies, please let me 
> know.

Just to confirm that this looks much better now – it is now showing the correct 
Item count for our repository ☺

> 2. Extended analysis emails

> Emails are still broken, but after entering your email address you will 
> immediately get the link to the extended
> analysis in the webUI as a temporary workaround.

Thanks again for sending me a link to the extended analysis for our repository 
– it all came back looking OK, so that’s nice ☺

> 3. Sense and nonsense of my repository speed measurements

> Found that my measurement was actually measuring more than just ONE page 
> request. Changed this so you
> should get considerably lower response time reports now.

And I can confirm that this is also now looking much better from here – our 
response time is now showing as around 300ms (down from 2000ms), so that is 
also nice to see ☺

Thanks again,

Mike
Michael White
eLearning Liaison and Development (eLD)
Information Services
S8, Library
University of Stirling
Stirling SCOTLAND
FK9 4LA
Email: michael.wh...@stir.ac.uk<mailto:michael.wh...@stir.ac.uk>
Tel: +44 (0) 1786 466877
Fax: +44 (0) 1786 466880
http://www.stir.ac.uk/is/staff/about/teams/aldt/#eld

From: bluy...@gmail.com [mailto:bluy...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Bram Luyten
Sent: 20 September 2014 13:45
To: Michael White
Cc: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] Free web tool for analyzing DSpace SEO analysis

Hi,

short update after rolling out a few changes directly on 
http://dspacecheck-atmire.rhcloud.com/

1. Discrepancy in item count

This should now be fixed. If anyone finds other discrepancies, please let me 
know.

2. Extended analysis emails

Emails are still broken, but after entering your email address you will 
immediately get the link to the extended analysis in the webUI as a temporary 
workaround.

3. Sense and nonsense of my repository speed measurements

Found that my measurement was actually measuring more than just ONE page 
request. Changed this so you should get considerably lower response time 
reports now.

best regards,

Bram

--
[http://atmire.com/images/@mire_web_2.jpg]

Bram Luyten +1 202 684 6365
2888 Loker Avenue East, Suite 315, Carlsbad, CA. 92010
Esperantolaan 4, Heverlee 3001, Belgium
www.atmire.com<http://atmire.com/website/?q=services&utm_source=emailfooter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=braml>


On 20 September 2014 12:56, Bram Luyten 
<b...@atmire.com<mailto:b...@atmire.com>> wrote:
Hi Michael,

thanks for your feedback on the prototype of this new tool:

1. Discrepancy in item count

Thanks for reporting this, as it will help me debugging. The script retrieves 
the item count from the browse-title 
page<http://dspace.stir.ac.uk/browse?type=title>, parsing it from the string 
"Showing results 1 to 20 of 8509".

Will need to figure out why this is currently not working on your repo.

2. Extended analysis emails

All outgoing emails are broken since earlier this month. I was happily using 
Gmail SMTP for this, but it is now rejecting the emails. I will need to make 
gmail happy again or move off to a different email provider.

In the meanwhile, I'll send you a personal email with the link that directs you 
to the extended analysis of your repository.

3. Sense and nonsense of my repository speed measurements

I need to get a better speed measurement in place and include in the 
description that the app currently runs on the redhat openshift cloud in the US.

This means the measurement is obviously biased towards US repositories and will 
partially explain why you get a worse result for a repository based in the UK.

For me personally, browsing here from my couch in Belgium, one of the fastest / 
"snappiest" repositories is CADAIR:
http://cadair.aber.ac.uk/dspace/

Just clicking around, yours feels *very* fast as well Michael, so I wouldn't 
worry about the responsetime reported by my blunt instrument.

Anyhow, if you're interested in this type of analysis, I would recommend to 
hook up your repository to New Relic ( http://newrelic.com/ ) that has awesome 
and detailed reports and monitoring.

best regards,

Bram

--
[http://atmire.com/images/@mire_web_2.jpg]

Bram Luyten +1 202 684 6365<tel:%2B1%20202%20684%206365>
2888 Loker Avenue East, Suite 315, Carlsbad, CA. 92010
Esperantolaan 4, Heverlee 3001, Belgium
www.atmire.com<http://atmire.com/website/?q=services&utm_source=emailfooter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=braml>


On 16 September 2014 17:01, Michael White 
<michael.wh...@stir.ac.uk<mailto:michael.wh...@stir.ac.uk>> wrote:
Hi,

> we have deployed a prototype of a free tool that can analyze a few SEO
> properties for your DSpace repository. More precisely, the tool can take a
> look at your robots.txt file to see if there potential problems.

Having just upgraded to v4.1 and done my best to carry out SEO, I thought I'd 
have a look at this out of curiosity and have a couple of questions:

- the Itemcount for our repository shows as 7536 items, but the actual number 
of items in our repository is 8496 - any ideas where the discrepancy is 
creeping in? The sitemap referenced from our robots.txt lists 8626 objects 
(which includes Items along with Community and Collection Homepages) so I don't 
think it is the case that the Itemcount is being (correctly?) generated from 
the sitemap referenced in robots.txt (or is it?!) . . . .

- I wanted to see the Extended Analysis but it is asking for an email address 
with the same domain as our repository - as our repository is 
dspace.stir.ac.uk<http://dspace.stir.ac.uk> I thought it would be OK with 
michael.wh...@stir.ac.uk<mailto:michael.wh...@stir.ac.uk> but I've not received 
anything as yet (and the email didn't appear to have been Junked either) - 
should I have received anything, or is that email domain not acceptable?

- the response time for the homepage of my repository is generally being 
reported at around 2000 milliseconds (I tried it a few times :-)), but the text 
on that page says some DSpace sites can serve pages in under 100ms:

"The faster your site is, the better. Some DSpaces can serve pages under 100ms. 
If you experience substantially slower loading times you may need to optimize."

I didn't think of our repository as slow, but should I (i.e. does 2000 
milliseconds constitute a "substantially slower loading time")? And if so, any 
thoughts why our repository is 20 times slower than the potential value noted 
on that page (yes, I appreciate this is "why is my bit of string longer than 
yours" type question ;-) )? Perhaps it is just a "geographical" issue (I'm 
guessing the analysis is being done stateside, so repositories on this side of 
the pond might expect longer response times?)? Or maybe, in certain 
configurations, DSpace just runs faster/slower (e.g. we are using JSPUI with 
Apache in front of Tomcat along with Postgres, all on the same Virtual Linux 
box) . . . ? And, if relevant, what is the optimization that is being alluded 
to in the text on that page?

Thanks in advance for any insights anyone might have.

Cheers,

Mike

Michael White
eLearning Liaison and Development (eLD)
Information Services
S8, Library
University of Stirling
Stirling SCOTLAND
FK9 4LA
Email: michael.wh...@stir.ac.uk<mailto:michael.wh...@stir.ac.uk>
Tel: +44 (0) 1786 466877<tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201786%20466877>
Fax: +44 (0) 1786 466880<tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201786%20466880>
http://www.stir.ac.uk/is/staff/about/teams/aldt/#eld


>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 18:06:48 +0200
> From: Bram Luyten <b...@atmire.com<mailto:b...@atmire.com>>
> Subject: [Dspace-tech] Free web tool for analyzing DSpace SEO analysis
> To: DSpace Tech 
> <dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>>,
>   General List
>       
> <dspace-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:dspace-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net>>
> Message-ID:
>       <CACwo3X0_5w=c1xJ=dQFJhJeh+MboTFMqetxi17Ved5SAYUmo9g@
> mail.gmail.com<http://mail.gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi,
>
> we have deployed a prototype of a free tool that can analyze a few SEO
> properties for your DSpace repository. More precisely, the tool can take a
> look at your robots.txt file to see if there potential problems.
>
> You can access the tool here:
> https://bitly.com/or14-analysis
>
> If the tool identifies certain problems, you can find more information at:
> https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSDOC4x/Search+Engine+Optimization
>
> This tool was partly developed at the Open Repositories 2014 Developer
> Challenge. A short slidedeck is available at:
> http://www.slideshare.net/bramluyten/big-elephant
>
> If you have any suggestions for this tool, please feel free to send them.
> We intend to extend this tool with a few more tests in the future.
>
> enjoy the weekend,
>
> Bram Luyten
>
> --
> [image: logo]
> *Bram Luyten* +1 202 684 6365<tel:%2B1%20202%20684%206365>
> *2888 Loker Avenue East, Suite 315, Carlsbad, CA. 92010*
> *Esperantolaan 4, Heverlee 3001, Belgium*
> www.atmire.com<http://www.atmire.com>
> <http://atmire.com/website/?q=services&utm_source=emailfooter&utm_me
> dium=email&utm_campaign=braml>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>


--
The University of Stirling has been ranked in the top 12 of UK universities for 
graduate employment*.
94% of our 2012 graduates were in work and/or further study within six months 
of graduation.
*The Telegraph
The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC 
011159.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
List Etiquette: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette



-- 
The University of Stirling has been ranked in the top 12 of UK universities for 
graduate employment*.
94% of our 2012 graduates were in work and/or further study within six months 
of graduation.
*The Telegraph
The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC 
011159.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
List Etiquette: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette

Reply via email to