Hey Tim,

No reason for not submitting a pull request and I for sure can move the
code around a bit. However, I don't see a way around adding dspace-oai
classes as a dependency. At the end of the day the consumer just calls
org.dspace.xoai.app.XOAI.index.

xmlui webapp does not have dspace-oai jar/classes in it's WEB-INF dir, the
same is probably true for jspui webapp.

Perhaps there is another approach?

Regards,
OK

2015-05-27 16:23 GMT+02:00 Tim Donohue <tdono...@duraspace.org>:

> Hi Ondřej,
>
> I wonder if you'd be willing to submit a Pull Request of these changes
> (the new OAIIndexEventConsumer, etc)?  These seem like potentially useful
> changes overall, and would be something we'd consider adding to DSpace.
>
> My only (small) recommendation would be to simply put the
> OAIIndexEventConsumer into the "dspace-api", so that it can be easily
> enabled/disabled from the "event.dispatcher.default.consumers" setting.
> Plus, if it's in the dspace-api, that ensures it'd also be triggered by any
> updates from other interface (XMLUI, JSPUI, REST, etc)
>
> - Tim
>
> On 5/27/2015 5:08 AM, Ondřej Košarko wrote:
>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: *Ondrej Kosarko* <ko...@centrum.cz <mailto:ko...@centrum.cz>>
>> Date: 2015-05-27 12:05 GMT+02:00
>> Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] OAI-PMH data provider 2.0 not persistent?
>> To: Christian Scheible <christian.schei...@uni-konstanz.de
>> <mailto:christian.schei...@uni-konstanz.de>>
>> Cc: "dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
>> <mailto:dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>"
>> <dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
>> <mailto:dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> I'm not sure I remember all the setup, but here goes...
>>
>> in dspace.cfg there is
>>
>>    event.dispatcher.default.consumers = versioning, discovery, eperson,
>> harvester, eudatreplication, *xoai*
>>
>>
>> and
>>
>> # consumer to maintain the oai index
>> event.consumer.xoai.class = cz.cuni.mff.ufal.event.OAIIndexEventConsumer
>> event.consumer.xoai.filters =
>>
>> Community|Collection|Item|Bundle|Bitstream+Add|Create|Modify|Modify_Metadata|Delete|Remove
>>
>>
>> and you need to make sure the class is found by the event dispatcher, we
>> solve it by adding dspace-oai(where the consumer lives) as a dependency
>> to dspace-xmlui
>>
>> diff --git a/dspace-xmlui/pom.xml b/dspace-xmlui/pom.xml
>> index 17d75c0..f19257f 100644
>> --- a/dspace-xmlui/pom.xml
>> +++ b/dspace-xmlui/pom.xml
>> @@ -93,6 +93,22 @@
>>       </profiles>
>>       <dependencies>
>> +     <!-- because of event listener that updates oai -->
>> +        <dependency>
>> +               <groupId>org.dspace</groupId>
>> +               <artifactId>dspace-oai</artifactId>
>> +        <classifier>classes</classifier>
>> +        </dependency>
>>
>> I think that's about it...
>>
>> Regards,
>> OK
>>
>>
>> 2015-05-27 9:05 GMT+02:00 Christian Scheible
>> <christian.schei...@uni-konstanz.de
>> <mailto:christian.schei...@uni-konstanz.de>>:
>>
>>     Hi Ondřej,
>>
>>     I have seen that you are using your own OAIIndexEventConsumer. We
>>     did the same but I added It in the module additions (which leads to
>>     code duplication).
>>     How do you register your Consumer? Is it the same way as for other
>>     consumers? Because I couldn't solve that problem.
>>
>>     Best Regards,
>>     Christian
>>
>>
>>     Am 27.05.2015 um 08:41 schrieb Ondřej Košarko:
>>
>>>     In short no...
>>>
>>>     As I've suggested in the thread the indexAll should include also
>>>     the withdrawn, that's what we do
>>>
>>> https://github.com/ufal/lindat-dspace/blob/lindat/dspace-oai/src/main/java/org/dspace/xoai/app/XOAI.java#L193
>>>     We use our Event consumer to trigger the update (it currently
>>>     doesn't handle caching and changes in discoverable flag)
>>>
>>> https://github.com/ufal/lindat-dspace/blob/lindat/dspace-oai/src/main/java/cz/cuni/mff/ufal/event/OAIIndexEventConsumer.java
>>>     And by the way dspace changed the deletion mode to transient in
>>>     https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/DS-2491 so maybe the right way
>>>     for dspace is updating the documentation...
>>>
>>>
>>>     OK
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     2015-05-26 23:19 GMT+02:00 Jozef Misutka <misu...@ufal.mff.cuni.cz
>>>     <mailto:misu...@ufal.mff.cuni.cz>>:
>>>
>>>         Ondrej, is this happening to us as well?
>>>
>>>         jm
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>         *From: *"Tim Donohue" <tdono...@duraspace.org
>>>         <mailto:tdono...@duraspace.org>>
>>>         *To: *dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>         <mailto:dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>         *Sent: *Tuesday, 26 May, 2015 23:09:20
>>>
>>>         *Subject: *Re: [Dspace-tech] OAI-PMH data provider 2.0 not
>>>
>>>         persistent?
>>>
>>>         Hi All,
>>>
>>>         I'm only just now "re-discovering" this thread, as I've found
>>>         this same
>>>         behavior in DSpace OAI-PMH servers. Here's how to see this
>>>         behavior (and
>>>         I've double checked it on http://demo.dspace.org, running 5.2):
>>>
>>>         1. Create an Item
>>>         2. Run the OAI-PMH import (./dspace oai import).
>>>         3. The item now appears in OAI-PMH
>>>         4. Withdraw that Item
>>>         5. Re-Run the OAI-PMH import (./dspace oai import)
>>>         6. The Item still appears in OAI-PMH and is NEVER flagged as
>>>         withdrawn.
>>>
>>>         So, you can still access all its metadata, etc. The ONLY way
>>>         to trigger
>>>         an update to the OAI-PMH record (of the withdrawn item) is to
>>>         re-import
>>>         EVERYTHING (./dspace oai import -c). However, as noted, since
>>>         withdrawn
>>>         items are not included in the XOAI "indexAll()" command, the
>>>         item will
>>>         now disappear from OAI-PMH entirely.
>>>
>>>         Here's that indexAll() command:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/DSpace/DSpace/blob/master/dspace-oai/src/main/java/org/dspace/xoai/app/XOAI.java#L191
>>>
>>>         This behavior seems to be counter to what is documented at:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.duraspace.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=45548245#OAI-PMHDataProvider2.0%28Internals%29-Deletions
>>>
>>>         The documentation specifically states that "DSpace keeps a
>>>         permanent
>>>         record of withdrawn items". It also states that a request for a
>>>         withdrawn item "will yield the 'record deleted' header".
>>>
>>>         This sounds like a bug to me. The documentation definitely
>>>         does not
>>>         match with the behavior.
>>>
>>>         I've created a new bug ticket for this. It will need a
>>>         volunteer to resolve.
>>>
>>>         https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/DS-2593
>>>
>>>         - Tim
>>>
>>>         On 3/6/2015 5:21 AM, helix84 wrote:
>>>         > Yes, that makes sense. Still, it needs a brief verification
>>>         because
>>>         > sometimes our understanding of a concept and its
>>>         implementation may
>>>         > differ.
>>>         >
>>>         >
>>>         > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Kristian Roberto Salcedo
>>>         > <k.r.salc...@ub.uio.no <mailto:k.r.salc...@ub.uio.no>> wrote:
>>>         >> Hi Ivan,
>>>         >>
>>>         >> I might have overlooked something, but from your comments
>>>         on https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/DS-2491 wouldnt it be
>>>         meaningful
>>>         >> to do both your declaration change and Ondřej's suggestion
>>>         in order to match both what is declared and what the
>>>         documentation says about OAI and deleted items?
>>>         >>
>>>         >> regards,
>>>         >> Kristian
>>>         >>
>>>         >>> -----Original Message-----
>>>         >>> From: ivan.ma...@gmail.com <mailto:ivan.ma...@gmail.com>
>>>         [mailto:ivan.ma...@gmail.com <mailto:ivan.ma...@gmail.com>] On
>>>         Behalf Of
>>>         >>> helix84
>>>         >>> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 3:46 PM
>>>         >>> To: Kristian Roberto Salcedo
>>>         >>> Cc: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>         <mailto:dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>; João Melo
>>>         >>> Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] OAI-PMH data provider 2.0 not
>>>         persistent?
>>>         >>>
>>>         >>> Hi Kristian,
>>>         >>>
>>>         >>> I think you're right that the declared
>>>         >>> <deletedRecord>persistent</deletedRecord> doesn't match
>>>         how DSpace
>>>         >>> behaves. I filed a Jira issue and created a pull request
>>>         to change the declared
>>>         >>> status to <deletedRecord>transient</deletedRecord>.
>>>         >>>
>>>         >>> https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/DS-2491
>>>         >>>
>>>         >>>
>>>         >>> Regards,
>>>         >>> ~~helix84
>>>         >>>
>>>         >>> Compulsory reading: DSpace Mailing List Etiquette
>>>         >>>
>>>         https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
>>>         >>>
>>>         >>>
>>>         >>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Kristian Roberto Salcedo
>>>         >>> <k.r.salc...@ub.uio.no <mailto:k.r.salc...@ub.uio.no>>
>>> wrote:
>>>         >>>> Hi all,
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> In Dspace 4.2 we are currently seeing that our OAI feeds
>>>         are not being
>>>         >>> persistent as per these definitions when it comes to
>>>         deleted (withdrawn)
>>>         >>> items:
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html#deletion
>>>         >>>>
>>>
>>> https://wiki.duraspace.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=34640887#OAI-
>>>         >>> P
>>>         >>>> MHDataProvider2.0(Internals)-Deletions
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> Withdrawn items do not get the <header status=deleted> as
>>>         they should,
>>>         >>> like in this example:
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>
>>>
>>> http://webservices.itcs.umich.edu/mediawiki/oaibp/index.php/Deleted_Re
>>>         >>>> cord_Example_1
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> Withdrawing an item is not reflected in the OAI entry in
>>>         any way.
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> This is our Identify page at the moment:
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> https://www.duo.uio.no/oai/request?verb=Identify
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> I believe we're doing everything right regarding config
>>>         parameters and
>>>         >>> maintenance of the solr oai index.
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> The only place I can find a "persistent"-parameter is in
>>>         this config file:
>>>         >>>> /www/var/data/dspace/config/oaicat.properties
>>>         >>>> which I thought was deprecated, but we still set it just
>>>         to be sure:
>>>         >>>> Identify.deletedRecord=persistent
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> All other relevant config parameters are set in these two
>>>         files as far as I can
>>>         >>> tell:
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> /www/var/data/dspace/config/modules/oai.cfg
>>>         >>>> /www/var/data/dspace/config/crosswalks/oai/description.xml
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> We are running the oai import -o command nightly.
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> The only way we've found to remove withdrawn items from
>>>         the OAI feed is
>>>         >>> by running a complete re-indexing of the oai solr index:
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> /www/var/data/dspace/bin/dspace oai import -c
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> with a subsequent
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> /www/var/data/dspace/bin/dspace oai clean-cache
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> This removes a withdrawn item:
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/42670
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> completely from the feed:
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>
>>>
>>> https://www.duo.uio.no/oai/request?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai
>>>         >>> _d
>>>         >>>> c&identifier=oai:localhost:10852/42670
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> which is not what we want...
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> Is anyone else experiencing the same problem?
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> Maybe I've missed something - If this actually works
>>>         differently than we
>>>         >>> expect or has been addressed in OAI 2.1, please let me know.
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>> regards,
>>>         >>>> Kristian Salcedo
>>>         >>>> Universitetet of Oslo Library
>>>         >>>> Department of digital services
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>>
>>>         >>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>         >>>> -------- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The
>>>         Go Parallel
>>>         >>>> Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership
>>>         with Slashdot
>>>         >>>> Media, is your hub for all things parallel software
>>>         development, from
>>>         >>>> weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case
>>>         studies,
>>>         >>>> tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation
>>>         now.
>>>         >>>> http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
>>>         >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>         >>>> DSpace-tech mailing list
>>>         >>>> DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>         <mailto:DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>         >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
>>>         >>>> List Etiquette:
>>>         >>>>
>>>         https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
>>>         >
>>>         >
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>         > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel
>>>         Website, sponsored
>>>         > by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media,
>>>         is your hub for all
>>>         > things parallel software development, from weekly thought
>>>         leadership blogs to
>>>         > news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look
>>>         and join the
>>>         > conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
>>>         > _______________________________________________
>>>         > DSpace-tech mailing list
>>>         > DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>         <mailto:DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>         > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
>>>         > List Etiquette:
>>>         https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
>>>         >
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         DSpace-tech mailing list
>>>         DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>         <mailto:DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
>>>         List Etiquette:
>>>         https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     DSpace-tech mailing list
>>>     DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net  <mailto:
>>> DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
>>>     List Etiquette:
>>> https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
>>>
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     Christian Scheible
>>     Softwareentwickler / Abt. Content-basierte Dienste
>>     Kommunikations-, Informations- und Medienzentrum (KIM)
>>     Universität Konstanz
>>     78457 Konstanz
>>     +49 (0)7531 / 88-2857
>>     Raum B 703
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     DSpace-tech mailing list
>>     DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
>>     <mailto:DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
>>     List Etiquette:
>>     https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DSpace-tech mailing list
>> DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
>> List Etiquette:
>> https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
List Etiquette: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette

Reply via email to