On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:18:31 +0200 Andreas Schneider <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 April 2009 23:33:25 Vadim Zeitlin wrote: > > What are the problems with the current build system that need to > > be fixed? Personally I'd rather avoid introducing another > > dependency into dspam build process unless really necessary. > > a) You need to know several languages to change something > (m4, automake, autoconf, bash) s/bash/sh/ since not all word is linux ;-) > b) Errors in the build system. For example: > > dspam-backend-mysql.x86_64: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > (Badness: 50) /usr/lib64/dspam/libmysql_drv.so > > This means the dynamic modules are compiled as a shared library > instead as a module. Can you elaborate on this? 1. It looks to me like a particular packaging system problem. 2. I think in the patches committed since 3.8.0R there's a fix for this (the way these patches where committed makes it very hard to track the changes -- this is one of our the problems that made us delay a new release). -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> [email protected], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
