On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:57:43 +0100 Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> wrote:
> Julien et al, > > what are your thoughts about having a "contrib/packaging/debian" folder, > in the tree, with the debianized structure for deb package creation? > Others would be welcomed too, like "contrib/packaging/rpm" or others. Seems a little strage to me, since I suppose these live in each project's repo? Won't we be just replicate maintainers' work? Or do want to be ablbe to tell people soemthing like: download, untar, cd contrib/packages/..., make .... I'm not opposed to the idea, but I'm not sure I see the use. // Generally speaking, I think the maintainer knows best when to update his port. And I'm not a fan of unofficial ports/packages as it makes the work of the maintainers and developers harder IMO. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> [email protected], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
