On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:35:45 +0200, Julien Valroff <[email protected]> wrote: > Le vendredi 01 oct. 2010 à 13:26:19 (+0200), Julien Vehent a écrit : >> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:30:52 +0200, Julien Valroff <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Julien, >> > >> > Le vendredi 01 oct. 2010 à 10:20:20 (+0200), Julien Vehent a écrit : >> >> On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:07:50 +0200, Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > On 01/10/10 08:50, Eric Bischoff wrote: >> >> >>> I'd be more pessimistic on this figure. The hash driver seems to be >> >> >>> broken >> >> >>> and I do not think another release should be done while it isn't >> >> >>> fixed. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> However, I really think this should be fixed before a new release can >> >> >>> happen. >> >> >> >> >> >> Why is it so important? Because this is the default driver for Debian, >> >> >> Ubuntu and compatible distros. That means that basically, out of the >> >> >> box, dspam does not work as it should. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> What exactly is not working with the hash driver ? >> >> I build 3.9.1 on debian squeeze and it works fine, so far. >> > >> > I think kthis thread sums up the issue: >> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01740.html >> > >> > Also check the bugtracker (I think I remember some of the mail of the >> > thread >> > point to the bug tracker issues). >> > >> >> Indeed. After trying the css* commands, it seems that the dictionnary of the >> user is broken... >> >> Oct 1 13:21:48 server dspam[11085]: Unable to open file for writing: >> /var/spool/dspam/data/example.net/user/user.css: Permission denied >> Oct 1 13:21:48 server dspam[11085]: Unable to attach DSPAM context. >> Retrying. >> Oct 1 13:21:48 server dspam[11085]: Unable to open file for writing: >> /var/spool/dspam/data/example.net/user/user.css: Permission denied > > Are you sure this is the problem described in the thread? >
No, it's not. Sorry for the noise, I assumed the problem was caused by running the commands,since I had just done that, but in fact those commands have changed the ownership of the files from dspam to root, hence refused the permission to dspam. So far, I can reproduce the segfault but my css files are still valid and working properly. Julien ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
