On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:28:57AM -0700, David Rees wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Chris Moules <christop...@gms.lu> wrote: > > NOTE: the patch that I sent was only for the single (repeated) error > > that I was receiving. This was while hitting the DB via dspam_train. > > > > I have been evaluating all the storage backends and found Hash to be the > > fastest, but seems buggy with TOE as trainingMode (it crashes, looks > > like when it tries to 'extend' the storage). > > Is training actually working for you on PostgreSQL? It does not appear > to be working for me... > > See: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30708939 > > Haven't had time to dig into the issue further yet. > > As a testament to dspam, on established accounts it still works very > well despite the lack of training, though it consistently misses some > newsletters because of it. > > -Dave >
Hi Dave, We have it working here with dspam-3.10.2 and postgresql-9.2.4. Cheers, Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
