-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:38:07 +0000 > Von: "Kārlis Repsons" <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] TrainPristine on + spamassassin/dspam headers
> On Saturday 13 February 2010 21:39:51 Stevan Bajić wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:04:20 +0000 > > > > Kārlis Repsons <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If TrainPristine is on, but stored mails get SpamAssassin and dspam > > > headers added, does unlearn become problematic? Maybe, if > "IgnoreHeader > > > X-Spam-Status" and similar get added (do dspam headers need to be > added > > > too?), that problem can be eliminated? > > > > Mathematically it get's complicated but in real world it's not such a > big > > issue (if at all). You could however add IgnoreHeader to work around > the > > issue. > > Thanks, just you didn't answer if dspam ignores its own headers or they > too > should be ignored with IgnoreHeader in dspam.conf? > If you feed the message as a corpus message then DSPAM is anyway ignoring it's own header. Regardless if you have set IgnoreHeader in dspam.conf or not. > So I understood, adding IgnoreHeader in this case eliminates the need to > worry > about math and dangers of inequalities -- please correct if I'm wrong! > Even if you would not include IgnoreHeader it should not make a big difference. But if you want to be ultra correct then adding the IgnoreHeader directive is the way to go. -- Sicherer, schneller und einfacher. Die aktuellen Internet-Browser - jetzt kostenlos herunterladen! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
