Le vendredi 07 mai 2010 à 14:20:41 (+0200), Stevan Bajić a écrit : > Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:20:41 +0200 > From: Stevan Bajić <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] DSPAM centralized setup for several MX servers > > On Fri, 7 May 2010 14:15:54 +0200 > Julien Valroff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Le vendredi 07 mai 2010 à 14:07:51 (+0200), Stevan Bajić a écrit : > > > Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:07:51 +0200 > > > From: Stevan Bajić <[email protected]> > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] DSPAM centralized setup for several MX servers > > [...] > > > There is no right/wrong in that regard. If you would use something like > > > SQLite then storing in database is problematic too. There is no quarantee > > > that storing everything in database is problem free. > > > > If that would prevent use of suid, that would be a really big thing! > > > Which suid do you mean? The one on the dspam binary? Or do you mean the use > of something like suEXEC on the Web-UI?
Well, both, though you are right, my first thoughts were for the use of suExec for the WebGUI. > > I wish I could write this patch myself... > > > It is never to late to start coding :) I know I know. I do my best to try and understand things, but it takes time... and just like everybody I guess, I wish days count more than 24 hours ;) Cheers, Julien ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
