Stevan Bajić kirjoitti:
> 10 years? DSPAM does not exist that long :)
That's why I said "almost" ;-).
> See? The whole message just has an attachment called latterly.rtf and DSPAM
> does not tokenize attachments.
>
> So you limit DSPAM to just be able to tokenize stuff it finds in the headers.
> I don't have show factors on and I add my signature just to the headers but
> for the test I am quickly going to turn them on.
I understand that it is hard for DSpam to correctly classify messages
like that.
But the bug is not about the classification; the bug is about DSpam not
finding the signature while it exists on both message body and the headers.
-Jari
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
