Hello Stevan,
Results are way better at the moment, thank you!
nor...@*.nl:
TP True Positives: 774
TN True Negatives: 2109
FP False Positives: 3
FN False Negatives: 290
SC Spam Corpusfed: 0
NC Nonspam Corpusfed: 0
TL Training Left: 388
SHR Spam Hit Rate 72.74%
HSR Ham Strike Rate: 0.14%
PPV Positive predictive value: 99.61%
OCA Overall Accuracy: 90.77%
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Norman Uittenbogaart <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Stevan put the new config in hope it helps, thanks ! :)
> I'm using shared,managed for several reasons, it is in front of another spam
> filter so lots of spam isn't coming through that I can train, now I can also
> train those mails.
> I have users who don't understand forwarding email for spam training and
> working with quarantines.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Stevan Bajić <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:39:13 +0200
>> Norman Uittenbogaart <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Sounds great thanks !
>> >
>> I attached your dspam.conf that you sent me with some changes. The main
>> change is that I switched the tokenizer to OSB and added a bunch of
>> IgnoreHeader lines. And I changed the PurgeXXXX lines since you are probably
>> purging with the help of the SQL purge script and the purge days are
>> specified there and not in dspam.conf.
>>
>> You probably should empty the old tokens form your DSPAM installation by
>> running, after you have exchanged your old dspam.conf with the new one:
>> TRUNCATE `dspam_signature_data`;
>> TRUNCATE `dspam_stats`;
>> TRUNCATE `dspam_token_data`;
>>
>> You wrote that you use "shared,managed" for your user. Might I ask why?
>>
>> --
>> Kind Regards from Switzerland,
>>
>> Stevan Bajić
>>
>>
>> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Stevan Bajić <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I am currently out of office working on a project. As soon as I get
>> > > home I
>> > > will quickly look over your dspam.conf and send you a bunch of
>> > > suggestions.
>> > > Okay?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Kind Regards from Switzerland,
>> > >
>> > > Stevan Bajić
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:15:50 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart <
>> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Ok thats not a big problem as this is not really working out.....
>> > > Which one should I use ?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Stevan Bajić <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hallo Norman,
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> getting higher accuracy would require to start from the beginning
>> > >> since
>> > >> the tokenizer you use is not that intelligent and using anything
>> > >> other more
>> > >> intelligent would require you to start from the beginning with the
>> > >> learning.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Kind Regards from Switzerland,
>> > >>
>> > >> Stevan Bajić
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:18:37 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart <
>> > >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi Stevan,
>> > >>
>> > >> Any suggestions to getting the accuracy up would be great !
>> > >> My user is shared,managed in the groups file for the domains used
>> > >> now..
>> > >>
>> > >> nor...@t*.nl:
>> > >> TP True Positives: 856
>> > >> TN True Negatives: 6650
>> > >> FP False Positives: 6
>> > >> FN False Negatives: 2097
>> > >> SC Spam Corpusfed: 0
>> > >> NC Nonspam Corpusfed: 0
>> > >> TL Training Left: 0
>> > >> SHR Spam Hit Rate 28.99%
>> > >> HSR Ham Strike Rate: 0.09%
>> > >> PPV Positive predictive value: 99.30%
>> > >> OCA Overall Accuracy: 78.11%
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Stevan Bajić <[email protected]>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Hallo Norman,
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> you asked "what is wrong". Right? Nothing is wrong with your DSPAM
>> > >>> installation. There are things you could do better but nothing is
>> > >>> really,
>> > >>> really wrong.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Could you post the output of "dspam_stats -H ".
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>> Kind Regards from Switzerland,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Stevan Bajić
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:51:30 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart <
>> > >>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Hello Stevan,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Herewith enclosed my config.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Kind regards,
>> > >>> Norman
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Stevan Bajić <[email protected]>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> Hello,
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> the statistic alone is not enough information for telling why your
>> > >>>> accuracy is down. You need to post your dspam.conf.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> --
>> > >>>> Kind Regards from Switzerland,
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Stevan Bajić
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:29:06 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart <
>> > >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> I have been running and training dspam for while now, but it is not
>> > >>>> at
>> > >>>> all effective at the moment.
>> > >>>> What could be wrong ?
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> SPAM messages Good messages Since last reset 2083 missed 6
>> > >>>> missed 856
>> > >>>> caught 6558 delivered 29.126% caught 0.091% missed Total
>> > >>>> processed by
>> > >>>> filter 2097 missed 6 missed 856 caught 6559 delivered From corpus
>> > >>>> 0
>> > >>>> fed 0 fed
>> > >>>> Metric Calculated as Overall accuracy (since last reset)
>> > >>>> *78.017%* (SPAM
>> > >>>> messages caught + Good messages delivered) / Total number of
>> > >>>> messages Spam
>> > >>>> identification (since last reset) *29.126%* (Spam catch rate only)
>> > >>>> Spam
>> > >>>> ratio (of total processed) *31.025%* Total SPAM messages (both
>> > >>>> caught &
>> > >>>> missed) / Total number of message
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >>>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
>> > >>>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
>> > >>>> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
>> > >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
>> > >>>> _______________________________________________
>> > >>>> Dspam-user mailing list
>> > >>>> [email protected]
>> > >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
>> > >>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
>> > >>> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
>> > >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>> > >>> Dspam-user mailing list
>> > >>> [email protected]
>> > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
>> > >> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
>> > >> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
>> > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> Dspam-user mailing list
>> > >> [email protected]
>> > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
>> > > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
>> > > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
>> > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Dspam-user mailing list
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
>> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
>> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dspam-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
