On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 08:20:37AM -0500, tom wrote: > It can take a lot of work to filter spam. > > However even under a very slow box I was still hitting <30 seconds. > (slow: Epia Via 500MHz 512MB RAM) > > I would first review your database performance. > > On Dec 31, 2006, at 8:09 AM, Dave Shariff Yadallee - System > Administrator a.k.a. The Root of the Problem wrote: > > >Using Sendmail 8.13.8 and my set up configuration is: > > > > > >CC=/usr/bin/gcc CXX=/usr/bin/g++ CFLAGS="-g -DDEBUG -O9 -Wall - > >march=i686" \ > >CXXFLAGS=-Wno-deprecated CPPFLAGS=-Wno-deprecated \ > >CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/X11/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/contrib/include" \ > >LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib -L/usr/contrib/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib" \ > >M4=/usr/contrib/bin/m4 \ > >./configure \ > > --prefix=/usr/contrib \ > > --localstatedir=/var \ > > --infodir=/usr/share/info \ > > --mandir=/usr/share/man \ > > --enable-dependency-tracking \ > > --enable-shared=yes \ > > --enable-static=yes \ > > --enable-fast-install=yes \ > > --disable-ldap \ > > --enable-clamav \ > > --enable-debug \ > > --enable-syslog \ > > --enable-bnr-debug \ > > --disable-homedir \ > > --disable-mysql4-initialization \ > > --disable-preferences-extension \ > > --disable-long-usernames \ > > --enable-domain-scale \ > > --enable-warnings=yes,proto \ > > --disable-profiling \ > > --with-dspam-home=/var/spam \ > > --with-dspam-home-mode=2770 \ > > --with-dspam-home-owner=root \ > > --with-dspam-home-group=smmsp \ > > --with-logfile=/var/log/dspam.log \ > > --with-dspam-mode=2555 \ > > --with-dspam-owner=root \ > > --with-dspam-group=smmsp \ > > --with-delivery-agent=/usr/bin/procmail \ > > --with-logdir=/var/dspam/log \ > > --with-storage-driver=hash_drv > > > >Without dspam, mail get through in less than one minute, and with > >dspam > >as per instructions, mail can take 2+ minutes if lucky. > > > >Can anyone tell me why this overhead is present? > >
I went back to a hash after the databases were not working. Added local users need to be adding into trust? The whole LAN should be trusted. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
